Strengthening Zakat Institutions through Evidence-Based Governance: A Comparative Legal Study of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore

Authors

  • M. Kamal Fathoni Universitas Jambi, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66882/iil.v1i1.5

Keywords:

zakat governance, zakat institutions, evidence-based governance, institutional accountability, Islamic law

Abstract

Zakat institutions operate within increasingly complex governance environments in which legal authority, financial accountability, social welfare, and institutional effectiveness must be reconciled. Formal regulation, transparency requirements, and digitalisation, however, do not necessarily ensure that institutional decisions are informed by reliable evidence or responsive to changing social needs. This article examines how evidence is incorporated into contemporary zakat governance and identifies institutional arrangements that enable evidence to inform legitimate, accountable, and effective decision-making. Employing normative legal research with a comparative legal approach, the study examines the governance frameworks and institutional practices of zakat administration in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore. The analysis focuses on the legal allocation of authority, information and reporting mechanisms, supervisory arrangements, beneficiary-oriented decision-making, and institutional evaluation. The findings demonstrate that effective zakat governance depends not merely on formal authority or disclosure, but on the institutional capacity to transform verified information into decisions and to subject those decisions to systematic evaluation. Building on the comparative findings, this article proposes a Reflexive Evidence-Based Governance Model comprising five interconnected functions: evidence generation, institutional decision-making, implementation, outcome evaluation, and corrective learning. The model reconceptualises accountability from a primarily retrospective compliance mechanism into a continuous institutional capacity for explanation, evaluation, and correction. It further positions zakat institutions as learning legal institutions in which evidence can influence subsequent decisions while remaining within the normative boundaries of Islamic law and maqāṣid al-sharīʿah. The model offers a functional governance framework applicable across diverse contemporary Muslim jurisdictions.

References

Accountant General’s Department of Malaysia, Islamic Accounting Standards for Baitulmal, Zakat and Wakaf (PPIBZW) (2024).

Ahmad Baehaqi, Anis Chariri, and Tri Jatmiko Wahyu Prabowo. “The Governance of Zakat Institutions: A Meta-Narrative Review.” Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi Dan Keuangan 15, no. 2 (2025). https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v15i2.39656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v15i2.39656

Bhat, P. Ishwara. “Comparative Method of Legal Research: Nature, Process, and Potentiality.” In Idea and Methods of Legal Research, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199493098.001.0001

Bilo, Charlotte, and Anna Carolina Machado. “The Role of Zakat in the Provision of Social Protection: A Comparison between Jordan and Sudan.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 40, no. 3–4 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-11-2018-0218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-11-2018-0218

Elhag, Nourjelha. “Beyond Charity: Under What Conditions Can Zakat Complement Social Protection Floors?” International Social Security Review 79, no. 2 (2026): 69–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.70031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.70031

Elvira, Rini. “Good Amil Governance According to Zakat Core Principle: A Concept to Improve The Efficiency and Effectiveness of Zakat Management.” Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE) 6, no. 3 (2023).

Glenn, H. Patrick. Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199669837.001.0001

Hoecke, Mark Van. Methodologies of Legal Research: Which Kind of Method for What Kind of Discipline? LMU Munich: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013.

———. “Methodology of Comparative Legal Research.” Recht En Methode in Onderzoek En Onderwijs, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5553/rem/.000010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5553/REM/.000010

International Labour Organization. “World Social Protection Report 2024-26: Universal Social Protection for Climate Action and a Just Transition.” Geneva, 2024.

Islamic Development Bank and World Bank. Zakat Core Principles: Compliance and Prudential Requirements for Zakat Institutions. Jeddah: Islamic Development Bank, 2016.

Kamaruddin, Muhammad Iqmal Hisham, Zurina Shafii, Mustafa Mohammed Hanefah, Supiah Salleh, and Nurazalia Zakaria. “Exploring Shariah Audit Practices in Zakat and Waqf Institutions in Malaysia.” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research 15, no. 3 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-07-2022-0190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-07-2022-0190

Mahadi, Rozaidy, Noor Kaziemah Sariman, Raman Noordin, Rasid Mail, and Nur Shahida Ab Fatah. “Corporate Governance Structure of State Islamic Religious Councils in Malaysia.” International Journal of Asian Social Science 8, no. 7 (2018). https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2018.87.388.395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2018.87.388.395

Naqiuddin, Mohamad Nafiz, Mohamad Azim, and Abdul Bari Awang. “The Maqāṣid Al-Sharīʿah in the Governance of Zakāh Institutions: A Theoretical and Applied Study.” International Journal of Fiqh and Usul Al-Fiqh Studies 10, no. 1 (2026): 131–46. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijfus.v10i1.418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31436/ijfus.v10i1.418

Nelken, David. “Comparative Legal Research and Legal Culture: Facts, Approaches, and Values.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-084950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-084950

Ninglasari, Sri Yayu, and Mumuh Muhammad. “Zakat Digitalization: Effectiveness of Zakat Management During Covid-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Islamic Economic Laws 4, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.23917/jisel.v4i1.12442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/jisel.v4i1.12442

Oderkerk, Marieke. “Methods of Comparative Legal Research: How to Set Up and Carry Out a Comparative Legal Research Project.” In Uncovering European Private Law: A Student Handbook, 2025. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0448.16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0448.16

Republic of Indonesia. Law No. 23 of 2011 concerning Zakat Management (2011).

Republic of Indonesia, Government Regulation No. 14 of 2014 concerning the Implementation of Law No. 23 of 2011 concerning Zakat Management.

Singapore, Administration of Muslim Law Act 1966

Syukur, Syuhelmaidi, Muji Astuti Rejosumarto, and Nur Syamsudin Buchori. “The Comprehensive Examination of Zakat Governance Standards of Amil Zakat Institutions in Indonesia.” Account and Financial Management Journal 11, no. 1 (2026): 4128–36. https://doi.org/10.47191/afmj/v11i1.15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47191/afmj/v11i1.15

Tambunan, Jannus, Purnama Hidayah Harahap, and Muhammad Danil. “Accountability of Zakat Institutions: Integrating Islamic Law and Maqāṣid Al-Sharī‘ah Perspectives in Fair Governance.” As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law 6, no. 1 (2026): 271–90. https://doi.org/10.24042/as-siyasi.v61.31173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/as-siyasi.v61.31173

Triatmo, Agus Wahyu, Ravik Karsidi, Drajat Tri Kartono, and Suwarto Suwarto. “The Inefficiency of Zakat Management in BAZNAS Sragen Indonesia.” Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies 20, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.18196/aiijis.2020.0121.209-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/AIIJIS.2020.0121.209-227

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World Social Report 2024: Social Development in Times of Converging Crises: A Call for Global Action. New York: United Nations, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18356/9789211065183

Wahyudi, Muhamad, Sri Herianingrum, and Ririn Tri Ratnasari. “Accountability Practices Based on Zakat Institutions Website in Indonesia.” Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan 9, no. 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.17509/jrak.v9i3.31225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jrak.v9i3.31225

Wahyuni-TD, Ika Sari, Hasnah Haron, and Yudi Fernando. “The Effects of Good Governance and Fraud Prevention on Performance of the Zakat Institutions in Indonesia: A Sharīʿah Forensic Accounting Perspective.” International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management 14, no. 4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-03-2019-0089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-03-2019-0089

Widiastuti, Tika, Eko Fajar Cahyono, Siti Zulaikha, Imron Mawardi, and Muhammad Ubaidillah Al Mustofa. “Optimizing Zakat Governance in East Java Using Analytical Network Process (ANP): The Role of Zakat Technology (ZakaTech).” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research 12, no. 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2020-0307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2020-0307

World Bank. “Poverty, Prosperity, and Planet Report 2024: Pathways Out of the Polycrisis.” Washington, DC, 2024.

Zaari, Ali Rajeh R., Elmira Hasibuan, Rifadillah Wahyu, and Muhammad R. Jassin. “Siyāsah Sharʿiyyah and State Governance in Zakat Management: A Case Analysis of Judicial Review on BAZNAS Authority Vis-à-Vis LAZ/BAZ Institutions.” Jurnal Indo-Islamika 15, no. 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.15408/jii.v15i1.47332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/jii.v15i1.47332

Zakiy, Faris Shalahuddin, Falikhatun Falikhatun, and Najim Nur Fauziah. “Sharia Governance and Organizational Performance in Zakat Management Organization: Evidence from Indonesia.” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research 16, no. 6 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-06-2023-0188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-06-2023-0188

Downloads

Published

2026-08-25

How to Cite

Strengthening Zakat Institutions through Evidence-Based Governance: A Comparative Legal Study of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore. (2026). Institutions of Islamic Law, 1(1), 72-92. https://doi.org/10.66882/iil.v1i1.5