Reconstructing Waqf Governance: Institutional Accountability and Sustainable Development in Muslim Societies

Hendri K.

doi:10.66882/iil.v1i1.2

Authors

Hendri K. UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66882/iil.v1i1.2

Keywords:

waqf governance, institutional accountability, Islamic legal institutions, comparative Islamic law, legal pluralism

Abstract

Contemporary waqf governance has expanded through statutory regulation, institutional reform, professional management, and financial oversight, yet accountability remains fragmented across the institutions responsible for administering endowed assets. Existing scholarship has examined legal compliance, financial accountability, managerial performance, and stakeholder responsibility largely as distinct governance concerns, leaving insufficient conceptual integration of these functions within an institutional legal architecture. The study reconstructs waqf governance through an Integrated Institutional Accountability Framework (IIAF) developed from normative legal research, doctrinal analysis, comparative institutional examination, and conceptual synthesis of contemporary scholarship. Comparative analysis of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Türkiye reveals that differences in statutory authority, trusteeship, administrative control, and supervisory arrangements generate distinct accountability configurations without fully connecting institutional authority to responsibility, verification, stakeholder scrutiny, and social outcomes. The IIAF integrates six dimensions (legal, Sharīʿah, administrative, financial, stakeholder, and developmental accountability) within a layered architecture linking institutional authority, responsible action, verification, public scrutiny, and sustainable benefit. Its principal contribution lies not in identifying separate forms of accountability, but in explaining their institutional interdependence as a condition of legitimate and sustainable waqf governance. The framework consequently extends Islamic legal scholarship beyond doctrinal analysis toward an institutional account of how normative authority is organised, exercised, monitored, and translated into public benefit. Its wider application to zakat, baitul māl, Islamic charitable foundations, and other Islamic legal institutions provides a basis for comparative inquiry rather than an assumed universal model.

References

Ainol-Basirah, A. W., and A. K. Siti-Nabiha. “Accountability in Waqf Institutions: A Meta-Narrative Review.” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research 14, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-12-2021-0326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-12-2021-0326

Alimuddin, Nur Hazimah, and Aprilia Beta Suandi. “Addressing Financial Accountability Challenges in an Indonesian Waqf Institution: Insights Post-PSAK 412 Implementation.” The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research 28, no. 03 (2025). https://doi.org/10.33312/ijar.881. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33312/ijar.881

Auda, Jasser. Maqasid Al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. Herndon, VA: The International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvkc67tg

Badan Wakaf Indonesia. Pedoman Akuntansi Wakaf bagi Nazhir. Jakarta: Badan Wakaf Indonesia, 2024.

Bovens, Mark. “Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework.” European Law Journal 13, no. 4 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x

Department of Awqaf, Zakat and Hajj (JAWHAR). Collection of Fatwa on Waqf. Putrajaya: Department of Awqaf, Zakat and Hajj.

Department of Awqaf, Zakat and Hajj (JAWHAR). Waqf Information. Putrajaya: Department of Awqaf, Zakat and Hajj.

Department of Awqaf, Zakat and Hajj (JAWHAR). Waqf Policies. Putrajaya: Department of Awqaf, Zakat and Hajj.

Erny Arianty, M. Luthfi Mahrus, Miftahul Hadi, and Iin Indrawati. “Strengthening Sharia Accountability and Transparancy for the Optimization of Cash Waqf Linked Sukuk.” Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia 8, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v8i2.2380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v8i2.2380

Halimah, Nur. “Philosophical Foundations of Islamic Economics: The Formation of Islamic Economics from the Perspectives of Epistemology, Ontology, and Axiology.” IJIEF: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance 8, no. 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.35719/ijief.v8i1.2376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35719/ijief.v8i1.2376

Himmawan, M. Fikri, Sri Yayu Ninglasari, and Husnul Mirzal. “A Systematic Literature Review on Waqf Governance: Stakeholder Analysis.” International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-03-2025-0137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-03-2025-0137

Hoecke, Mark Van. Methodologies of Legal Research: Which Kind of Method for What Kind of Discipline? LMU Munich: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013.

Hutchinson, Terry. Researching and Writing in Law. 4th ed. Sydney: Lawbook Co., 2024.

Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. The Parameters of Halal and Haram in Islamic Law: An Islamic Legal Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024.

Koppell, Jonathan. World Rule: Accountability, Legitimacy, and the Design of Global Governance. chi: University of Chicago Press, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.48-4137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226450964.001.0001

Loughlin, Martin. “Political Jurisprudence.” In Law as Institution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198810223.003.0007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198810223.001.0001

Malaysia. Administration of Islamic Law (Federal Territories) Act 1993 (Act 505). Kuala Lumpur, 1993.

Malaysia. Federal Constitution. Ninth Schedule, State List, Item 1. Kuala Lumpur, 1957.

Ma’ani, Bahrul, Ardian Kurniawan, Hendri. K, Ilham Abdi Prawira, and Rusli Abdul Roni. “Living Waqf Beyond Formal Law: The Mattinja Tradition of Bugis Communities in Jambi’s Plural Legal Landscape.” Al-’Adalah 23, no. 1 (2026): 41–70. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v231.30936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v231.30936

Mohaiyadin, Norlaila Mazura Hj, Aini Aman, Mohd Rizal Palil, and Suzana Muhamad Said. “Addressing Accountability and Transparency Challenges in Waqf Management Using Blockchain Technology.” Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance 8 (2022): 53–80. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v8i0.1413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v8i0.1413

Mujahidin, Muhammad Imran, Nasrullah Bin Sapa, Fasiha, Sitti Aisya, and Trimulato. “Challenges in Waqf Management and Its Implications for the Social and Economic Welfare of Muslim Communities: A Cross-Country Comparative Analysis.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani 12, no. 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v12i1.7765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v12i1.7765

Nofianti, Leny, Murniati Mukhlisin, and Andi Irfan. “Cash Waqf Innovation in Islamic Financial Institutions and Its Governance Issues, Case Studies: Indonesia, Malaysia, Türkiye.” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research 17, no. 4 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-12-2023-0420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-12-2023-0420

Osman, Ahmad Zamri, and Gloria Agyemang. “Privileging Downward Accountability in Waqf Management.” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research 11, no. 3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-05-2017-0064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-05-2017-0064

Prasetiyo, Luhur, Unun Roudlotul Janah, and Khoirun Nisak. “Islamic Social Finance and Institutional Accountability A Case Study of Zakat and Philanthropic Organizations.” El-Barka: Journal of Islamic Economics and Business 8, no. 2 (2025): 212–43. https://doi.org/10.21154/elbarka.v8i2.11973.

Qurrata, Vika Annisa, Muhammad Hakimi Muhammad, Hairunnizam Wahid, Suhaili Almaamun, and Abdul Ghafar Ismail. “Institutional Economics from Islamic Perspective: With Special Reference to Waqf.” SAGE Open, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251397178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251397178

Republic of Indonesia. Law No. 41 of 2004 concerning Waqf. Jakarta, 2004.

Republic of Indonesia. Government Regulation No. 42 of 2006 concerning the Implementation of Law No. 41 of 2004 concerning Waqf. Jakarta, 2006.

Republic of Indonesia. Government Regulation No. 25 of 2018 concerning the Amendment to Government Regulation No. 42 of 2006 concerning the Implementation of Law No. 41 of 2004 concerning Waqf. Jakarta, 2018.

Republic of Türkiye. Foundations Law No. 5737. Official Gazette No. 26800, February 27, 2008.

Ruiter, Dick W. P. Legal Institutions. Dordrecht: Springer, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9765-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9765-4_4

Siswantoro, Dodik, Haula Rosdiana, and Heri Fathurahman. “Reconstructing Accountability of the Cash Waqf (Endowment) Institution in Indonesia.” Managerial Finance 44, no. 5 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-05-2017-0188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-05-2017-0188

State of Selangor. Waqf (State of Selangor) Enactment 2015. Selangor, Malaysia, 2015.

Zulkipli, Zulkipli, Abdul Basit, and Farid Wajdi. “The Strategic Role Of Zakat And Waqf In Sustainable Poverty Alleviation: A Literature Review From The Perspective Of Islamic Economics.” Islamic Banking : Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pengembangan Perbankan Syariah 11, no. 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.36908/isbank.v11i1.1486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36908/isbank.v11i1.1486