The Institutional Turn in Islamic Legal Studies: Evidence from Indonesian Religious Courts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66882/iil.v1i1.1Keywords:
Islamic legal studies, institutional turn, institutional governance, legal authority, Religious CourtsAbstract
Islamic legal scholarship has traditionally centred on doctrinal interpretation, juristic reasoning, and socio-legal inquiry, while comparatively less attention has been given to the institutional structures through which Islamic legal authority is organised and exercised within contemporary states. This article examines the institutional transformation of the Indonesian Religious Courts to develop an institutional perspective that treats institutions not merely as settings for applying Islamic law, but as constitutive sites through which Islamic legal authority is formed, mediated, and exercised. Employing institutional legal analysis and documentary research, the study examines legislation, Supreme Court regulations, judicial reform documents, institutional reports, and official judicial statistics to trace changes in the jurisdiction, governance, organisational capacity, and digital administration of the Religious Courts. The findings demonstrate that their transformation extends beyond legislative reform to encompass jurisdictional expansion, integration within the national judicial system, organisational standardisation, and digital judicial governance. These developments indicate that the practical authority of Islamic law depends not only on doctrinal validity but also on the institutional conditions through which legal norms are governed, implemented, and recognised as authoritative in public legal practice. Building on these findings, the article develops an Institutional Framework for Contemporary Islamic Legal Studies comprising five interrelated dimensions: legal doctrine, institutional governance, institutional capacity, institutional legitimacy, and legal authority. The framework advances an institutional turn in Islamic legal studies by conceptualising institutions as constitutive sites of Islamic legal authority, thereby complementing rather than replacing doctrinal, socio-legal, and legal-pluralist approaches.
References
Asa’ari, and Nuzul Iskandar. “Ijtihād Qaḍāʾī under Bureaucratic Governance: Judicial Practice in the Religious Court of Sungai Penuh and Padang Panjang, Indonesia.” JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 25, no. 1 (2026): 185–200. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v25i1.16603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v25i1.16603
Asyiqin, Istianah Zainal, Fadia Fitriyanti, M. Endriyo Susila, M. Fabian Akbar, and Dimas Putra Wirayudha. “Transforming Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution through E-Court for Simple, Fast, and Affordable Justice.” Prophetic Law Review 7, no. 2 (2025). https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol7.iss2.art1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol7.iss2.art1
Ayoub, Samy A. “A Theory of a State? How Civil Law Ended Legal Pluralism in Modern Egypt.” Journal of Law and Religion 37, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2021.79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2021.79
Azzahra, Raihan, and Farid Sufian Shuaib. “Religious Courts in Indonesia and Malaysia: History, Structure, and Jurisdiction.” Indonesian Comparative Law Review 4, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.18196/iclr.v4i2.15911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/iclr.v4i2.15911
Bhat, P. Ishwara. Idea and Methods of Legal Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199493098.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199493098.001.0001
———. “Qualitative Legal Research: A Methodological Discourse.” In Idea and Methods of Legal Research, 2020.
Cammack, Mark. “Indonesia’s 1989 Religious Judicature Act: Islamization of Indonesia or Indonesianization of Islam?” Indonesia 63 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/3351514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3351514
Cammack, Mark E., and R. Michael Feener. “The Islamic Legal System in Indonesia.” In Islamic Law in Practice, Vol. 3, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315251738.
———. “The Islamic Legal System in Indonesia.” In Islamic Law in Practice, Vol. 3, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315251738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315251738
Clark, David S., and Martin Shapiro. “Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 31, no. 1 (1983). https://doi.org/10.2307/839612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/839612
Djawas, Mursyid, Abidin Nurdin, Muslim Zainuddin, Idham, and Zahratul Idami. “Harmonization of State, Custom, and Islamic Law in Aceh: Perspective of Legal Pluralism.” Hasanuddin Law Review 10, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v10i1.4824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v10i1.4824
Dobinson, Ian, and Francis Johns. “Legal Research as Qualitative Research.” In Research Methods for Law, edited by Mike McConville and Wing Hong Chui, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474404259-005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474404259-005
Dupret, Baudouin. “What Is Islamic Law?: A Praxiological Answer and an Egyptian Case Study.” Theory, Culture & Society 24, no. 2 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407074997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407074997
Eryandi Ray, Tamrin Kamal, Saifullah, Desi Asmerat, and Julhadi. “The Dynamics and Challenges of the Islamic Judicial System in Indonesia: A Historical Study and Institutionalization of Religious Courts.” Jurnal Al-Qadau: Peradilan Dan Hukum Keluarga Islam 12, no. 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.24252/al-qadau.v12i1.55287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/al-qadau.v12i1.55287
Feener, R. Michael. Sharia and Social Engineering: The Implementation of Islamic Law in Contemporary Aceh, Indonesia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199678846.001.0001
Gad Makhlouf, Ahmed. “The Doctrinal Development of Contemporary Islamic Law: Fiqh Academies as an Institutional Framework.” Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 10, no. 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwac005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwac005
Ginsburg, Tom. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511511189.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511189
Hallaq, Wael B. Sharī’a: Theory, Practice, Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815300
Hamoudi, Haider Ala. “Research Methods for Islamic Law.” In Research Methods for Law, edited by McConville and Chui, 3rd ed., 151–164. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781399515092-011
Hovden, Eirik. “Understanding and Framing Change in Islamic Law: Potentials and Possible Pitfalls of the Concepts of Canonization and Codification.” Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 12, no. 3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwae020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwae020
Jahar, Asep Saepudin. “Bureaucratizing Sharia in Modern Indonesia: The Case of Zakat, Waqf and Family Law.” Studia Islamika 26, no. 2 (2019): 207–245. https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v26i2.7797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v26i2.7797
Malik, Ridwan, M. Thahir Maloko, and Fatmawati. “Strengthening Judicial Authority in Sharia Economic Disputes: A Legal Study of Indonesia’s Religious Courts.” Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah 9, no. 2 (2025): 243–57. https://doi.org/10.26618/csf64p78.
March, JM, and JP Olsen. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New Jersey: Free Press, 1989.
McConville, Mike, and Wing Hong Chui, eds. Research Methods for Law. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781399515092
Müller, Dominik M. “Islam, Law, and the State.” In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Anthropology, edited by Marie-Claire Foblets, Mark Goodale, Maria Sapignoli, and Olaf Zenker, 192–209. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198840534.013.16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198840534.013.16
North, Douglass C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
Oberauer, Norbert, Yvonne Prief, and Ulrike Qubajat, eds. “Legal Pluralism in Muslim Contexts.” In Studies in Islamic Law and Society, 19th ed. Leiden: Brill, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004398269
Oraby, Mona, and Winnifred Fallers Sullivan. “Law and Religion: Reimagining the Entanglement of Two Universals.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-020520-022638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-020520-022638
Rahman, K. C.Mujeebu, and Anindita Chakrabarti. “Sharia, Legal Pluralism and Muslim Personal Law: Ethnographic Lessons from the Mahallu System of Malabar, India.” Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 42, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2022.2051946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2022.2051946
Republic of Indonesia, Law No. 3 of 2006 concerning the Amendment to Law No. 7 of 1989 on Religious Courts.
Republic of Indonesia, Law No. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power.
Republic of Indonesia, Law No. 50 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law No. 7 of 1989 on Religious Courts.
Rokhmad, Abu. “Institutions and Contributions to Islamic Law in Indonesia’s Legal System.” Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) 3, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.21580/walrev.2021.3.1.7282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21580/walrev.2021.3.1.7282
Sani, Hanisah Binte Abdullah. “State Law and Legal Pluralism: Towards an Appraisal.” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 52, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2020.1727726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2020.1727726
Schmidt, Vivien A. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
Scott, W. Richard. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2013.
Suadi, Amran. “The Role of Religious Court in Islamic Law Reform in Indonesia.” Asy-Syari’ah 21, no. 2 (2020): 125–134. https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v21i2.5821. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v21i2.5821
Suchman, Mark C. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” Academy of Management Review 20, no. 3 (1995). https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, PERMA No. 1 of 2019 concerning Administration of Cases and Trials in Courts Electronically (2019), as amended by PERMA No. 7 of 2022 concerning Amendments to PERMA No. 1 of 2019.
Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Annual Report 2024 (Jakarta: Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, 2025).
Tyler, Tom R. “Whither Legitimacy? Legal Authority in the Twenty-First Century.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110722-074236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110722-074236
Whyte, Shaheen. “Are Fatwas Dispensable? Examining the Contemporary Relevance and Authority of Fatwas in Australia.” Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 11, no. 2–3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwac015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwac015
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Institutions of Islamic Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
